The Wired Jester

Entries categorized as ‘Creativity’

My Favourite Piece of Travel Writing

October 11, 2008 · 1 Comment

My favourite piece of travel writing is short and to the point, but it questions everything about ‘here’ and calls to mind perfectly the change of ‘there’ that is its lure.

It is a description of people in an airport, and how easily they strike up conversation with each other. They are:

‘Strangers rendered open-hearted from jet lag’
(Pico Iyer, The Global Soul)

We travel to be operated on; by the sun, by the sights, by there, the place we want to get to, and most of all, by the miles of distance between there and here, by the separation itself.

Categories: Books and reading · Creativity · Thought For The Day · Travel

Drops wet cement on unsuspecting crippled children: Web 2.0 vandalism

March 25, 2008 · No Comments

Last FM vandals

By now you’ve hopefully seen Juno; it’s a wonderful film with a sharp script and well drawn characters. It uses music beautifully, too. Rather than simply whacking it down as a thudding backbeat to some flash images (CSI), or using overfamiliar tunes to prop up dead scenes, the team behind Juno make the music integral to the shots it plays over. It’s distinctive, too - rather than the familiar grab-bag of orchestral/rock/pop/mulch that many films opt for - it’s generally acoustic, scratchy, and on the surface at least, quite twee. The opening in particular, uses a tune by Barry Louis Polisar that’s extremely… sunny… as you can see from this YouTube clip of the film’s beginning.

While playing the soundtrack, I looked up some info through the Last.FM app - and found some pretty funny tags hanging around Mr Polisar, as you can see from the screenshot above.

Even better, it seems like ‘drops wet cement on unsuspecting crippled children’ is not, as you might think, a lonely furrow to plough. Nope, as you can see, it’s quite a thriving genre:

drops wet cement on unsuspecting crippled children

Title and artists for a mixtape, right there people.

I actually think this is quite a cool use of tagging - just as we’ve seen users on Flickr using somewhat abstract, emotional terms to describe their pictures, Last.FM users are using tags for opinions/reviews/jokes. Just goes to show how complex a field search is, I think - plain text search is fine, but more often than not, people plot links to things based on far more intangible criteria.

Categories: Creativity · Web

The Wired Jester 2.0

August 20, 2007 · No Comments

London Bridge

Picture caption: The road to the future, yesterday. Lots of concrete and white light. No robots in sight.

It’s been a while since there’s been a longer post on the Wired Jester, so I thought I’d drop one in, partly because I’m quite proud of the above shot at London Bridge and wanted to show it off, and partly because I have genuinely been thinking about what to do with this site going forward. At the moment, I’m enjoying the link blogging - it’s quick, light and easy, and it fits in well with all the DIY I’ve been doing in my spare time in new house, but I have got a new idea for the Jester that will hopefully see it getting a little more use than just as a link repository. As ever, it’s just a matter of finding the time and figuring out priorities…

Categories: Creativity · In My Life · Site Stuff

5 Ways To Beat Writer’s Block

June 26, 2007 · 1 Comment

Aside from grand dreams of writing a bestselling novel, my only real plan as I went through school and university was to avoid ending up being a teacher and to somehow make a living writing. I’ve been fortunate enough that apart from a brief spell as a bad telemarketer and a decidedly unmysterious mystery shopper, writing has been how I’ve made money to live. There’s a lot to recommend writing as a career, but it does mean that you sign up to be stalked - and eventually caught - by writer’s block.

I think it probably hits everyone differently; for me, it’s less the traditional big, black depressive weight and more a feeling of flimsiness and incredible lightness: when I’ve got it, I can’t focus or hold on to any thought and I’m incredibly easily distracted. But deadlines being what they are - albeit slightly less lethal than the Civil War originals - there are times when  you just need to get on with it. So here are the methods I use when I need to crank out some words:

The first one to try is to start at a different point. One of the main disadvantages of how most people write now - using a word processor - is that it presents an unwritten piece of writing as a series of sequential blank lines that should be filled. It’s just not as easy to skip around in a Word doc as it is on a piece of paper, and I think this has contributed to people losing sight of the fact that only when a piece of writing is finished is it even remotely linear (and even then, if you’re B.S. Johnson, writer of the ‘book-in-the-box‘ that’s not true). So until you’re done, you can, as a writer go anywhere, and you should. If you can’t think of a good intro, but know what you want to say about a certain point, go there. Start where you’re most enthusiastic. You may even find that where you want to start should actually be the start, and that your fixed, linear plan - the one that made no sense to your writing brain, and gummed it up in the first place - needed fixing all along.

Secondly, if you’re convinced what your writing is just minging - that somehow, your prose is just having an ugly day - try doing the spade work instead. If you have any hand-written notes from the planing stage, or quotes you’ve underlined in books that you want
to use, when you’ve got writer’s block, it’s a good time to type them
into the word processor - it’s simple, useful work, and often, as you simply get into the typing, that your own writing will want to get going, too.

Because I like to believe the act of writing is more dramatic than it looks, this third technique  sounds like a move from Streetfighter 2:  unleash super stream fury. Written English is full of rules: spelling, grammar, good manners (such as not beginning a sentence with the word ‘ because’). If your inspiration is fragile, if you’re chasing a delicate meaning then these structures can easily halt your progress. So sometimes you need to just type. Don’t go near the comma or full stop buttons, don’t use the enter button, don’t think about tense or grammar: JUST TYPE. Don’t even look at the screen. Don’t be afraid to leave sentences hanging, or to repeat something in slightly different form. Just go for it, and fix it when you come back on the 2nd draft.

My fourth tip is similar to the first point: if you can’t write something, try inverting it. So if you’re writing a part of the piece that takes an overview of the situation, go for a closer look instead. Switch from the globe to the microscope, or vice versa. Although it’s a radical change, as it’s related to what you’re trying to write (i.e., it is its opposite), it will often work, and even if it doesn’t, it may help you figure out what it is you’re trying to say.

And finally, get out more. It doesn’t matter if you spend five, six, seven hours at the computer trying to write something and yet all you’ve managed to turn out is a few muddled lines. Quality, not quantity. A walk is a great way to clear the head, plus, if you’ve been huddled over a glowing screen for the last few hours, the flood of new images, sounds and smells from the outside world should act like a nitro boost to your cortex. It’s also a good opportunity to buy some milk/the paper/food for dinner, so even if you don’t get any ideas for writing, you can still tick a few errands off the list :)

Categories: Creativity

Most Hated Words

June 22, 2007 · No Comments

Godzilla speaks

“Teh internetz” are not always the best friend of the English language. Not that I subscribe to the idea that all this chatting on forums is ruining the kids’ ability to use language - after all, a language is a living thing, and should be, needs to be, remoulded, reworked, and re-engergised on a daily basis - but the IT world throws up some really ugly words, just plain minging arrangements of letters that should never be displayed on screen, let alone spoken out loud.

Nate Anderson at Ars Technica has a brief post up about a YouGov survey of the most annoying words spawned by the web. These include folksonomy, vlog and webinar. Nate adds a few of his own linguistic nails-on-a-blackboard moments - including the terrible ‘crowdsourcing’ and ‘AJAXify’ (although I’d disagree with his inclusion of ‘podcast’.

There are a few words that are regularly used to pepper press releases for hardware products, and have the same effects as seasoning your chile con carne with horse manure. Here are the terms that deserve to be publicly shamed like a first-round failure on X-Factor:

1. Solutions.

As in… “AMD continues to deliver technology solutions that improve the way we live, work and play.”

No. Solutions don’t improve things, they solve problems. ‘4′ is the solution to 2+2. Ordering a pizza when you’ve got no food in the house and everyone is starving. These are solutions, because they address direct, easily quantifiable problems.

2. Platform.

As in… “Creative is now driving digital entertainment on the PC platform with products like its highly acclaimed ZEN™ portable audio and media players.”

Nope. A platform is a place which trains arrive late to. Why even use the word ‘platform’ here?

3. Extreme.

As in… “NVIDIA’s GigaThread Technology, which, through the use of a massively multi-threaded architecture, is able to create thousands of independent, simultaneous threads, providing extreme processing efficiency for advanced, next generation shader programs.”

Nein. Forty degrees below zero. Fans of Adolf Hitler. Stoning people to death for stealing. These are extreme.

But the worst offender has to be…

4. Functionality.

As in… “Consumers today are demanding higher standards of digital entertainment experiences that enhance the very personal environments of their home,” said Satjiv S. Chahil, senior vice president, global marketing, Personal Systems Group, HP. “HP designers have achieved a much needed balance of form and functionality that enriches the experience and ease of use of today’s personal technology.”

What’s wrong with ‘function(s)’? If adding -ality to a word automatically added 30% more professionalism and excitment to something, I’d work for a publication called Custom PCality. You’d be searching the web with Googleality and enthusing about your iPod and its iTunesality. But it’s not, and you don’t. People, let’s end the -ality now.

Categories: Creativity · Tech

Flickr definitions: is an image worth a thousand words?

May 19, 2007 · 4 Comments

Definition of Homer

The phrase ‘in the dictionary, next to X, there’s a picture of you’ (where X is a negative term like stupidity) is a bit of an old comic standby - there’s a brilliant Simpsons episode based around it - and it works so well as a joke because it recognises the truth of another old saying: sometimes an image is worth a thousand words.

One of the interesting things Flickr has pioneered has been tagging; allowing users to label their photos. Flickr’s users (myself included) use these to not only describe what an image contains but also to describe what that image means - so if I check out the full list of tags I’ve used over the past couple of years, there are vague adjectives, adverbs and adjectives such as ‘contemplation‘ and ‘creepy‘ along with definite nouns like ‘London’ and ‘staircase‘.

I’m not the only one using tags for more than nouns - and given Flickr has millions of users and images, what this means is that you can use it as a visual dictionary. So, just for a bit of fun, I thought I’d put its powers to the test and look up Flickr’s top images for a few quite hard-to-define terms: FREEDOM, FEAR, PUNK, CONFUSION, IN LOVE, POWER, LONELINESS, HAPPINESS, EXCITEMENT and GOD.

I searched using tags only, and ordered my results by interestingness (i.e., the photos Flickr deems to have been most successful in terms of views and comments). I then thought I’d make this into a bit of a quiz to see how good Flickr is as a dictionary; I took the top photo for each search*, and they’re displayed below; when you roll your cursor over them, you can see what word they define.

* I used the top image, except where the Flickr user had disabled image downloading (as then
I couldn’t put it on this page with the nifty rollover answers), and I
also skipped any image that had the actual words in it.

Anyway, without further ado, let’s see how good Flickr is as a dictionary! Below are the ten terms I searched for, followed by the top image results - the first one on this page, the other nine after the jump. Just mouse over the pics to find out the answer. Let me know how you do!

FREEDOM, FEAR, PUNK, CONFUSION, IN LOVE, POWER, LONELINESS, HAPPINESS, EXCITEMENT, GOD


View the original image on Flickr.

(more…)

Categories: Creativity · Photography · Web

David Mitchell on writing

May 6, 2007 · No Comments

Black Swan Green

Unlike a lot of novelists, David Mitchell doesn’t do a lot (if any, actually?) journalism, so the lulls in between his novels can be hard for rabid entirely reasonable fans of his like myself. Having just finished his latest book, Black Swan Green, I’ve been ploughing the interwebs to see what’s out there, and it turns out Mitchell does give interviews to a very wide range of magazines and websites, and he seems generous with his time and thoughts; I thought I’d put together a list of some of the interviews of his that I’ve enjoyed recently:

First up, a piece by Mitchell himself that seems to have been written around the time Ghostwritten was published, when he still lived in Japan; it focuses on the country’s influence on his writing:

“When I was a kid, my main talent was sulking — spectacular, multi-day sulks. I don’t think I sulked to manipulate: the point was to isolate myself. I sometimes believe that my real motive behind living abroad is to enjoy the same fruit. This lack of belonging encourages me to write: I lack a sense of citizenship in the real world, and in some ways, commitment to it. To compensate, I stake out a life in the country called writing… a mental state (mental is the
word!), where characters and plots in the head achieve the solidity of people and lives outside the head… For me, my ability to compound inner-skull reality is a direct result of my life away from where I ‘belong.’”

BBC Nottingham’s interview with him dates from the Cloud Atlas publicity tour; it’s short and to the point, but worth it for the list of five books he recommends to reading groups, and his five tips for writers at the end.

The Morning News has a great, meandering, post-Black Swan Green discussion which focusses on the craft of writing:

“I think all novels are actually compounded short stories. It’s just the borders get so porous and so squished up that you no longer see them, but I think they are there. And I do structure my novels in that way.”

Finally, worth a listen is a recent podcast/interview with Mitchell by novellist Ian Hocking. It’s an engaging half hour which covers Mitchell’s current project, along with a lot of stuff about Black Swan Green.

Categories: Books and reading · Creativity

First Lines over Twitter

May 3, 2007 · 1 Comment

TwitterLit: the first line of a book, sent to you via Twitter (or RSS), but with only an Amazon link to the title, so you can try and guess where it’s from. Found via the excellent blog of writer Ian Hocking. Lovely idea, since first lines are such a compelling topic to think about. Although I love the opening to Orwell’s 1984, and of course, as I’ve mentioned before, the opening to Neuromancer, I think my favourite first line is the one from Toni Morrison’s Paradise:

"They shoot the white girl first."

Simple, short, stark and yet stacked with questions. Interesting tense, too.

UPDATE: There’s now a UK version of Twitterlit, which links to Amazon.co.uk, here, and you can also get updates via Email, in addition to Twitter and RSS.

Categories: Books and reading · Creativity · Web

Barry Miles and International Times: ‘The invisible insurrection of a million minds’

April 23, 2007 · 1 Comment

International Times

Last week I went to a panel discussion on magazines; although I took notes on all three speakers, I ended up with loads from the talk by Barry Miles, co-founder of 60s underground paper International Times (Wikipedia). He talked at length about I.T.’s genesis, launch party and development, which I found fascinating. Here are my full notes. Bear in mind these notes were scribbled at pace, so apologies for any errors/omissions.

On the genesis of I.T.:

“We put on a poetry reading at the Albert Hall in 1965. It cost £400 to hire, then another £100 an hour. And bear I mind, I earned £10 a week at this time, and we had only 9 days to publicise it. But we sold the tickets and it went ahead, and we saw that we, youth culture, were a real constituency. It’s very, very difficult now to imagine how straight England was, even in the mid 60s. It was a very black and white world then.”

On I.T. being totally counter to Fleet street and established media:

“The idea of anyone from our community writing for the Guardian or the Times was inconceivable. None of the papers had any popular music coverage in those days. Our group of people needed somewhere to express themselves, so in early 1966, Hoppy (John Hopkins) and I started to put it together. We got the guy who’d been editor of Peace Times for CND, to help, too. He’d gotten freaked out and left London and gone to live in the countryside, but we got him to come back.”

On I.T.’s launch:

“We had the launch party at the Roundhouse in Camden. It had been used for storing gin, and had been abandoned for seventeen years. It was just a big space with a balcony that was apparently unsafe. But it was ideal for IT. Soft Machine and The Pink Floyd played. I remember paying them - Pink Floyd got £15 because they had a light show, and Soft Machine got £12. Although they had a motorcycle on stage, so maybe that was a bit unfair.”

On how I.T. was written and distributed:

“I.T. wasn’t properly edited. It depended a lot on people bringing stuff in. It was the same with distribution - anyone could come in a grab 50 copies, and we just trusted them to bring the money back, and then they could get some more copies. By 1969, I.T.’s height, we were printing about 44,000 copies, and it was going out every two weeks or so, unless we’d been busted or something.”

How I.T. got into advertising and staved off financial collapse:

“The first few issues had a lot of serious articles by William Burroughs about the overthrow of the state. He used it as his platform to work out his ideas. And there was Ginsberg too. All the usual suspects. When we were running out of money, I was talking to Paul McCartney about it, and he said, ‘Well, you should interview me, then you’ll get ads from the record companies.’ And I thought, ‘hey, he might be on to something.’ So I interviewed him, and then George Harrison, and then the next week Mick Jagger called up, demanding to be interviewed too. And Paul was right, we got ads from the record companies.”

On I.T. and the community:

“We’d have these happenings on Tottenham Court Road. Lots of people would come down - The Beatles, Pete Townshend. He’d pay £20 or something on the door, becuase he knew it was going to I.T. It was a community paper, our community’s paper, so people put into it. I.T. was outside normal society in every respect.”

Categories: Creativity · On Journalism and Media · The Sixties

A Worm’s Eye View: Some site updates and more

July 17, 2006 · No Comments

Some brief site updates: thanks to Blogharbor support, I’ve fixed the site’s URL so that www.thewiredjester.co.uk works properly (i.e. it no longer just does a simple re-direct). This was done using a CNAME setting at 1 and 1, where I bought the domain from, and a quick e-mail to Blog Harbor’s support department to sort things at their end. Blog Harbor users who’ve bought their domain from a 3rd party registry might like to take a look here for the precise details of how to get it all working.

I’ve also been updating the links on the right-hand side, cleaning out some old ones that pointed to sites which are no longer active, and expanding the tech ones. Some of these new links point to sites I refer to a lot for work (Tech Report, Ars Technica), while others are blogs that I’ve been reading lately, including Wil’s (he runs Bit-Tech a site which I contribute to and greatly enjoy reading), and Helmintholog, which is the weblog of Andrew Brown, a journalist and writer. I started reading it after coming across the column he writes for the Guardian, Worm’s Eye View. Last week’s piece was like a piercingly cold drink on a hot day; I really *felt* it. It’s very much written from a writer’s perspective and the central comparison struck me as being true and clear:

“I am coming to suspect that the internet will be to my generation of journalists, and to any younger ones, what alcohol was to our predecessors’: a destroyer first of thought and then of productivity, destructive both of the capacity to reflect, and to react, blurring everything into a haze of talk and endlessly repeated variations on the same experience. Just like alcohol, and even cigarettes once were, it seems an inevitable part of the job, one of the things that distinguishes it from all others. Stories are chased and found on the net just as they once were in bars.”

Annoyingly, the Guardian don’t seem to keep copies of previous week’s columns, so the best I can do to guide you to the whole article is this, the Google cache of the page (no longer works, I’m afraid).

It’s been over a week since I originally read it and was so instantly taken that I jabbered on about it out to all and sundry; seven days on, I still think it’s exceptionally well written and crafted, with lots of rich little asides and a real sense of life running through it. And though I find the idea appealing, I do think there’s a lot for writers to gain from the internet; a sense of community, the ability to easily research ideas, and of course, stories: there’s nothing out there if not an absolute torrent of stories… As my good friend Phil has written in his most recent article for Bit-Tech, ‘The Age of The Web Hermit‘:

“Some might say that playing World Of Warcraft or Counter-Strike is not the most active of pastimes. This is true, but it’s not as if, in the event of the Blizzard servers suddenly all crashing and wiping themselves, the six million players of World of Warcraft would suddenly pick up footballs, hop on bicycles and head off to the park for some fresh air and a kick about. Do games make people inactive, or do inactive people flock to games?”

This is very much the case with writers, I feel: sure, the internet is a great distraction, but if I am ever without the internet, and have something to write, there’s always a cup of tea to be made, washing to be done, or, as Brown points out, windows to be stared out of…..

Categories: Creativity · On Journalism and Media · Tech