The Wired Jester

Entries categorized as ‘Web’

Drops wet cement on unsuspecting crippled children: Web 2.0 vandalism

March 25, 2008 · No Comments

Last FM vandals

By now you’ve hopefully seen Juno; it’s a wonderful film with a sharp script and well drawn characters. It uses music beautifully, too. Rather than simply whacking it down as a thudding backbeat to some flash images (CSI), or using overfamiliar tunes to prop up dead scenes, the team behind Juno make the music integral to the shots it plays over. It’s distinctive, too - rather than the familiar grab-bag of orchestral/rock/pop/mulch that many films opt for - it’s generally acoustic, scratchy, and on the surface at least, quite twee. The opening in particular, uses a tune by Barry Louis Polisar that’s extremely… sunny… as you can see from this YouTube clip of the film’s beginning.

While playing the soundtrack, I looked up some info through the Last.FM app - and found some pretty funny tags hanging around Mr Polisar, as you can see from the screenshot above.

Even better, it seems like ‘drops wet cement on unsuspecting crippled children’ is not, as you might think, a lonely furrow to plough. Nope, as you can see, it’s quite a thriving genre:

drops wet cement on unsuspecting crippled children

Title and artists for a mixtape, right there people.

I actually think this is quite a cool use of tagging - just as we’ve seen users on Flickr using somewhat abstract, emotional terms to describe their pictures, Last.FM users are using tags for opinions/reviews/jokes. Just goes to show how complex a field search is, I think - plain text search is fine, but more often than not, people plot links to things based on far more intangible criteria.

Categories: Creativity · Web

Blog not popular? No worries, just obsess over your Flickr stats instead

December 14, 2007 · 2 Comments

The Tube
I know, from careful perusal of my blog stats, that The Wired Jester appeals to a select, discerning audience: mostly people looking for information on the not-quite famous footballer who shares my name, some after information on Wolf Pillows, and every now and then my brother. Despite this, I do check the numbers quite regularly, and so am overjoyed that Flickr is introducing stats for photo streams. From the screen shots, it looks very similar to the stats screen in WordPress and will show referrers, linking sites and search engine traffic. From the sound of the FAQ, it’s a big upgrade to the current ’sort images by most popular’ option - which gives the above photo as my top image.

You have to activate the stats to get them working, and it takes 24 hours to kick in - so I’ve not had a chance to play with them yet. Stats are only available to Pro members, and when you do activate them, you get to look at a lovely mid-90s era animated gif:

Flickr Stats

Nice to see Flickr still knows how to talk to the geek in its fanbase :)

Categories: Photography · Web

Pownce invites up for grabs

September 6, 2007 · 3 Comments

Pownce Cat

A cat, ready to pounce, yesterday.

Just a short post; I’ve signed up to Pownce, the Twitter knock-off/second coming from, among others, Kevin Rose of Digg. The best thing about it is there’s a lot of vowels in the name compared to most Web 2.0 sites, but I’ve not used it that much yet.

Anyway, as a result of getting in, I have six Pownce invites available, so they’re up for grabs to you, my loyal, bribeable readers. Whereas my Joost invite give-away was first come, first served, this time, there will be an element of skill involved. Leave a comment on this post and add the name of your favourite pouncing animal, and the good ones will get invites.

Categories: Web

It’s finally here: the new CustomPC.co.uk

July 12, 2007 · 2 Comments

Custompc.co.uk

And I am so relieved. For the past 18 months or so, helping create a new website for Custom PC has been something of an obsession for me. I’ve talked endlessly about it on flights, in bars, in many, many meetings and bored the Jesteress to tears with all my ideas and frustrations. I’ve scribbled brainwaves in notebooks and written thousands of words to try and get the ball rolling and convince people/the company that what Custom PC needed was a really, truly, good website - and that what this would entail would be a very different site, organisation and approach to the one we already had.

One of the biggest problems Dennis has had (and it’s one shared by many other publishers, I think) is that when taking its print brands online, in the rush to ‘get down with this new thing called the web’, a lot of the good ways of working that we had developed on the magazine editorial side were thrown out - although they were of course accompanied along with some ones that did need to go. Baby and the bath water etc. So the creation and maintence of the sites was made largely separate from the print editorial side, etc etc. It is easy to see why; the web is, after all, very different to print. To some extent it’s true that a magazine should not work on the web - that’s why it is a magazine. A
website should not work if you print it out or disconnect it.

However, good magazines do tend to be produed by relatively small, dedicated teams who are passionate about both their subject and the medium in which they are working. In any good publication, there’s an awareness of how style, form and content can be blended together. The same is true for good websites. Make the teams too large and too dispersed, go for an approach that’s too generic, too rule-based and disconnected with what the content relates to and you get a site - or a magazine - that lacks any sense of life. So what you want is a magazine and the website to have shared DNA -
shared editorial values, perhaps some shared content
(depending on the project) and the same overall quality - but, crucially, this all needs to find a different form of expression in print and on the web. The DNA needs to create two seperate, independent, unique characters. Brother and sister, rather than two clones.

We work hard to produce a magazine that makes best use of the printed format (for instance, see this post),
and it became obvious to me that we needed to take a similar approach
online, and make a site that really, genuinely worked as a website. Not just a repository of text and picture content,
but a resource for PC hardware and news, a place for people to discuss
their computers, mods, tips and tricks: a flexible tool that could be
the hub of a techy community.

With our new site, I think we’re starting to get towards this nirvana: it’s all written by the same team as the magazine, it has both articles from the mag plus web-specific stuff (particularly the news, which my colleague Ben is doing a great job with), lots of RSS feeds, sensible URLs for ease-of-use, plus WordPress-powered blogs for both staff and readers, complete with file space, so you can chuck up your pictures, benchmarks, CPU-Z screenies and mod shots and not worry about hosting.

The next big upgrade will come when we start writing our copy using a database and then we’ll be able to do very smart things with benchmark data and tech specs. This is just one of the improvements scheduled to be added - we tinker with the magazine every issue, trying new things, improving it, honing it, and now that we’ve rebalanced the editorial team so that we all work across print and web, this should also be the case with the website.

In terms of inspirations, personally, this post by Information Architects Japan was what convinced me of the need for ‘big, clear text’ (although IA probably wouldn’t like the bright colours of the rest of our design), while the excellent Journerdism provided a constant stream of challenging, thought provoking discussions on the way print media was working (or not) online. Wordblog, Modern Life, Publishing 2.0 and MagCulture have all given me great ideas, too.

The editorial team and the project team at Dennis Interactive (DI) has worked really hard on making the site happen. The project has been a huge learning curve, because not only has it involved a lot of technical engineering for the coders and designers of DI, it’s also required a re-engineering and re-balancing of how editorial and interactive work together, and a reassessment of many, many aspects of the company’s old approach to the web. There is still a long way to go, but the new site is a good first step.

And, so without further ado, here it is. www.custompc.co.uk. I now have a work blog, www.custompc.co.uk/blogs/alexwatson, and if you want to subscribe to it the RSS feed is here.

Also, the Media Guardian has written up the site launch.

Categories: In My Life · On Journalism and Media · Tech · Web

Facebook is not the new AOL

July 2, 2007 · 3 Comments

Faceaol

Jason Kottke started the ball rolling for the ‘Facebook is the new AOL’ story by writing a tempting little note in a link post. It turned into a headline, and as the hours zipped by, a host of talented bloggers filled out the body of the story with some really good pieces. Is it true, though? Is the mighty Facebook (and its newly launched platform) really just the evil old AOL mindset in disguise?

Coding Horror’s Jeff Atwood is probably the most negative of the respondents assessing Facebook’s platform, saying that “I feel very strongly that we already have the world’s best public social networking tool right in front of us: it’s called the internet,” and eloquently arguing his point. Kottke himself has more praise for Facebook, but also makes it clear that he doesn’t think their platform is the future, while Mathew Ingram goes for a 50/50 balance, concluding hist post by saying, “I like Facebook a lot, and I totally see the value of the news feed and the photo-sharing and so on, and I think the F8 platform is a brilliant strategy. I’m a big Facebook fan. But I really like the Internet too.”

“Facebook = AOL 2.0 because it’s another walled garden” is the accusation. It’s an emotive comparison, a great headline and it paints a good picture - but I think ultimately it’s not true. Here’s why that equals sign shouldn’t be there:

I first got online in 1995 with a 14.4 modem, and at the bottom of the box were a couple of floppy disks containing a free month’s use of Compuserve. By day two of the trial I was spending most of my time in the browser, on the WWW, rather than on the Compuserve boards and member areas. I got fed up with the limited range of information, its shallow depth and the fact it all came from one rather bland editorial perspective. Out there on the web, I could find out anything.

And that was a new feeling then. The idea of unlimited information seemed like a good thing. A brilliant thing - although my parents weren’t so convinced as I took to tying up the house’s sole landline for hours at a time. But the web was great. Slow, certainly, but we had no idea what spam was, what malware was. We weren’t automatically suspicious of .ru sites, and we didn’t have to be ready to rip our headphones off when hitting a new site because a crappy ad was waiting to deafen us.

How times change.

The idea of a walled garden - a place with a reasonable, not infinite, amount of information, where a high degree of relevancy is actually attainable, where you’re dealing with people you know and trust, where ads are controlled and where there’s no spam, is, I think, incredibly attractive. Not to the hardcore, maybe, and not to me so much, but I’m sure you’ve got plenty of friends who are addicted to Facebook and who never used the web much before. Facebook works for them in a way that blogs, Flickr and Twitter don’t. Those services are morally wonderful, open, standard-loving, CC-sporting, RSS-spewing etc, but they’re just not catching on in the way the Facebook is.

The web is very different now to ten years ago; the majority of people go to places they trust, such as Wikipedia, the BBC, the big blogs like Engadget, because when people are foraging for information, the majority will take the most efficient, optimized path that is guaranteed to return a pretty good result - not an uneven, unbalanced approach that sometimes returns amazing results but that other times is simply frustrating and fruitless. The success of platforms like Facebook (it may not be FB themselves) and Wikipedia attest to this.

As Jakob Nielsen says in the piece linked to above, “Progress [when foraging for information] must seem rapid enough to be worth the predicted effort required to reach the destination.” Too often on the wide open web, this just isn’t the case. A walled garden is not as ‘good’ (in both moral and qualitative senses) as the free open plains of the WWW, but this, like so many other areas of human behaviour, isn’t about right and wrong.

Categories: Web

Flickr definitions: is an image worth a thousand words?

May 19, 2007 · 4 Comments

Definition of Homer

The phrase ‘in the dictionary, next to X, there’s a picture of you’ (where X is a negative term like stupidity) is a bit of an old comic standby - there’s a brilliant Simpsons episode based around it - and it works so well as a joke because it recognises the truth of another old saying: sometimes an image is worth a thousand words.

One of the interesting things Flickr has pioneered has been tagging; allowing users to label their photos. Flickr’s users (myself included) use these to not only describe what an image contains but also to describe what that image means - so if I check out the full list of tags I’ve used over the past couple of years, there are vague adjectives, adverbs and adjectives such as ‘contemplation‘ and ‘creepy‘ along with definite nouns like ‘London’ and ‘staircase‘.

I’m not the only one using tags for more than nouns - and given Flickr has millions of users and images, what this means is that you can use it as a visual dictionary. So, just for a bit of fun, I thought I’d put its powers to the test and look up Flickr’s top images for a few quite hard-to-define terms: FREEDOM, FEAR, PUNK, CONFUSION, IN LOVE, POWER, LONELINESS, HAPPINESS, EXCITEMENT and GOD.

I searched using tags only, and ordered my results by interestingness (i.e., the photos Flickr deems to have been most successful in terms of views and comments). I then thought I’d make this into a bit of a quiz to see how good Flickr is as a dictionary; I took the top photo for each search*, and they’re displayed below; when you roll your cursor over them, you can see what word they define.

* I used the top image, except where the Flickr user had disabled image downloading (as then
I couldn’t put it on this page with the nifty rollover answers), and I
also skipped any image that had the actual words in it.

Anyway, without further ado, let’s see how good Flickr is as a dictionary! Below are the ten terms I searched for, followed by the top image results - the first one on this page, the other nine after the jump. Just mouse over the pics to find out the answer. Let me know how you do!

FREEDOM, FEAR, PUNK, CONFUSION, IN LOVE, POWER, LONELINESS, HAPPINESS, EXCITEMENT, GOD


View the original image on Flickr.

(more…)

Categories: Creativity · Photography · Web

First Lines over Twitter

May 3, 2007 · 1 Comment

TwitterLit: the first line of a book, sent to you via Twitter (or RSS), but with only an Amazon link to the title, so you can try and guess where it’s from. Found via the excellent blog of writer Ian Hocking. Lovely idea, since first lines are such a compelling topic to think about. Although I love the opening to Orwell’s 1984, and of course, as I’ve mentioned before, the opening to Neuromancer, I think my favourite first line is the one from Toni Morrison’s Paradise:

"They shoot the white girl first."

Simple, short, stark and yet stacked with questions. Interesting tense, too.

UPDATE: There’s now a UK version of Twitterlit, which links to Amazon.co.uk, here, and you can also get updates via Email, in addition to Twitter and RSS.

Categories: Books and reading · Creativity · Web

Joost invites all gone - I wonder why?

April 16, 2007 · No Comments

The post title says it all - took a little over 24 hours, but my latest Joost invites are now all gone. The lucky recipients were:

* McGuyver
* Tony Jones of Compelling Content
* Alan Hussey
* Perry Taylor

When Joost next dole out some more invites, I’ll put a post up, same as before, so stay tuned.

I learned two things from this experiment:

1. Joost has phenomenal brand power; people are hugely interested in it, which is hardly surprising given the track record of the company’s founders. It’s interesting that it’s these previous projects and the rigmarole of the invites process which are being used to generate momentum/PR for Joost; it’s a start contrast to the way TV networks normally sell themselves, which is of course, on the basis of their content.

The main reason for this is that, as everyone who has received an invite from me finds out about 15 minutes after loading Joost up, there really isn’t a lot of content on there - certainly not that’s any good. Only the White Stripes and QOTSA interviews from Canadian TV have really held my interest.

I don’t think this is the only reason Joost is opting for a drip-drip-drip of info and invites; PR wise, the most successful company in the world right now is Apple, a company which generates huge media interest by opting for secrecy. It does make you wonder if Wired’s current cover story, ‘Get Naked And Rule the World‘ is a little off target. Given Apple and Joost’s approach, and of course the secrecy notoriously favoured by Google, do you really believe the following, from the article’s intro, is true?

“Smart companies are sharing secrets with rivals, blogging about
products in their pipeline, even admitting to their failures. The name
of this new game is RADICAL TRANSPARENCY, and it’s sweeping boardrooms
across the nation.”

2. The second fact I learned is that Google blog search is fantastic; I had comments responding to my post within 30 minutes - and I think, from the stats, that pretty much everyone found the post via Google (or via an existing bookmark) - not Technorati. Something for Technorati to be very worried about, I think.

Categories: TV · Tech · Web

Joost Invites

April 13, 2007 · 13 Comments

Joost™

As I am a well connected mover-n-shaker in the world of technology put my e-mail address into the Joost site early on, I have some Joost Beta invites going spare. E-mail me / leave a comment if you fancy one and giving the service a go.

UPDATE / 16th April. Invites all gone.

Categories: TV · Tech · Web

Bloggers versus Mainstream Media

March 27, 2007 · 3 Comments

"Print media is what it is. I can’t imagine anyone will be printing news on paper twenty years from now in the industrialized world" - the infamous Mike Arrington.

The bloggers have been tearing lumps out of the "mainstream media" again today, after rumours of trouble and lay offs at the San Francisco Chronicle hit the web. It all strikes me as pointless and just plain stupid grandstanding. Fine, so in 20 years time we’re not going to be printing newspapers according to Arrington - and many other people. But in 20 years time, can you say for sure we’re going to be reading blogs, RSS etc?  There’s a lot we do now that we won’t be doing in 5 years, let alone 20…. a fact that excuses no-one - bloggers, print journalists, politicians, celebrity chefs, polar bears - from preparing for that future. So enter now Robert Scoble to prove himself king of the dunces with his astonishingly dim witted post, graciously entitled ‘Newspapers are dead’:

"The industry has NOT invested in its future. It is reaping the rewards of that.

How many future journalists are being trained for the online world?

I can tell you how many: zero."

You can tell me, can you Scoble? I started University nearly 10 years ago and joined the student paper; the first thing we did was upgrade the computer systems, buy a very early digital camera and stick a web server in the corner. Fine, it wasn’t very good, but I learnt the HTML and PhotoShop skills I still use today. I wrote for student orientated websites as well as the student paper. I’ve worked for websites and currently I work for a print title; but we have a website, we’ve just launched a podcast, and we’ve got videos on YouTube. We might be taking it a little slowly compared to some web businesses, but we have limited time and limited resources and it’s all a learning process.

And we’re hardly alone; look at the top 100 podcasts on iTunes [UK], and where are they from? The vast majority are from the BBC, as you’d expect, but there are several from The Guardian, The Times and Stuff Magazine, all originally print titles, all with really impressive web operations. In the specific categories, such as, say… ooooh…. technology, you’ll find Stuff (again), along with our good selves Custom PC, and the FT. As a whole, you can certainly make the case that print titles are not fully embracing the beautiful creative and technical possibilities of the web; but are the bloggers? Is Scoble’s ropey design and dumb posting the best we can expect? And while TechCrunch has its value, would anyone seriously stand up and defend the lunk headed, poorly written rag that is Crunch Gear? These are the guys who bring you this sage analysis of the news that Microsoft has sold 20million licenses of Vista:

"The increase over XP isn’t very surprising since there is such a greater number of PC users now as compared to this time in 2002. "

Wow! Insight +1! Now that’s journalism.

Blogging is a great idea with tons of potential, no doubt, but blogs are one piece of the puzzle of how to make the best use of the web. Print isn’t dead either; it will just change; it will become either a freebie - because when there’s so much information for free, how else to compete? - or it will become a luxury item - because when information is free and virtual, it’s important for real things to be nice things, to be good quality things, to be a guaranteed brilliant use of the reader’s very precious time.

Change is the only constant.

 

Categories: On Journalism and Media · Web