The nicest piece of technology I have used all week

Innocent Smoothie

I have a lovely Macbook Pro laptop, a decent camera, dual-core work PC and an iPod, but the nicest piece of technology I have used all week is this: a drinks bottle.

I picked it up on the way to work this morning (mostly because I’m getting over a cold and wanted something healthy, and I chose this in particular because it proudly describes itself as a “thickie”, nicely reclaiming a playground insult as a positive word!), and it turns out the whole bottle isn’t plastic, but corn. And it’s 100% corn – there is no plastic used whatsoever, amazingly.

According to the Innocent website, the bottle will decompose in about six weeks in the right composting conditions, and they even have the pictures to prove it.

All in all, a lovely piece of design and technology. And the drink was top too. Although I maintain it’s not breakfast in a bottle unless bacon is involved.

links for 2007-07-05

On the Todo list: Japanese Human Tetris

The Jesteress, the most expert YouTuber I know, just sent me this link to an exerpt from a Japanese TV game show, where contestants play “human tetris”. They’re the last block and must complete the game by fitting into the shape in the advancing wall. It’s a funny watch, but even funnier was what happened when I saved it to Delicious.

Delicious suggests the tags other users have used for any item you save; normally, it’s a very handy time saver, but as you can, its suggestion for this particularl video was…. “todo”.

Todo

Blimey. I know it’s something of a passe meme to browse the web and conclude some people have somer strange hobbies, but… human tetris? Really?

Facebook is not the new AOL

Faceaol

Jason Kottke started the ball rolling for the ‘Facebook is the new AOL’ story by writing a tempting little note in a link post. It turned into a headline, and as the hours zipped by, a host of talented bloggers filled out the body of the story with some really good pieces. Is it true, though? Is the mighty Facebook (and its newly launched platform) really just the evil old AOL mindset in disguise?

Coding Horror’s Jeff Atwood is probably the most negative of the respondents assessing Facebook’s platform, saying that “I feel very strongly that we already have the world’s best public social networking tool right in front of us: it’s called the internet,” and eloquently arguing his point. Kottke himself has more praise for Facebook, but also makes it clear that he doesn’t think their platform is the future, while Mathew Ingram goes for a 50/50 balance, concluding hist post by saying, “I like Facebook a lot, and I totally see the value of the news feed and the photo-sharing and so on, and I think the F8 platform is a brilliant strategy. I’m a big Facebook fan. But I really like the Internet too.”

“Facebook = AOL 2.0 because it’s another walled garden” is the accusation. It’s an emotive comparison, a great headline and it paints a good picture – but I think ultimately it’s not true. Here’s why that equals sign shouldn’t be there:

I first got online in 1995 with a 14.4 modem, and at the bottom of the box were a couple of floppy disks containing a free month’s use of Compuserve. By day two of the trial I was spending most of my time in the browser, on the WWW, rather than on the Compuserve boards and member areas. I got fed up with the limited range of information, its shallow depth and the fact it all came from one rather bland editorial perspective. Out there on the web, I could find out anything.

And that was a new feeling then. The idea of unlimited information seemed like a good thing. A brilliant thing – although my parents weren’t so convinced as I took to tying up the house’s sole landline for hours at a time. But the web was great. Slow, certainly, but we had no idea what spam was, what malware was. We weren’t automatically suspicious of .ru sites, and we didn’t have to be ready to rip our headphones off when hitting a new site because a crappy ad was waiting to deafen us.

How times change.

The idea of a walled garden – a place with a reasonable, not infinite, amount of information, where a high degree of relevancy is actually attainable, where you’re dealing with people you know and trust, where ads are controlled and where there’s no spam, is, I think, incredibly attractive. Not to the hardcore, maybe, and not to me so much, but I’m sure you’ve got plenty of friends who are addicted to Facebook and who never used the web much before. Facebook works for them in a way that blogs, Flickr and Twitter don’t. Those services are morally wonderful, open, standard-loving, CC-sporting, RSS-spewing etc, but they’re just not catching on in the way the Facebook is.

The web is very different now to ten years ago; the majority of people go to places they trust, such as Wikipedia, the BBC, the big blogs like Engadget, because when people are foraging for information, the majority will take the most efficient, optimized path that is guaranteed to return a pretty good result – not an uneven, unbalanced approach that sometimes returns amazing results but that other times is simply frustrating and fruitless. The success of platforms like Facebook (it may not be FB themselves) and Wikipedia attest to this.

As Jakob Nielsen says in the piece linked to above, “Progress [when foraging for information] must seem rapid enough to be worth the predicted effort required to reach the destination.” Too often on the wide open web, this just isn’t the case. A walled garden is not as ‘good’ (in both moral and qualitative senses) as the free open plains of the WWW, but this, like so many other areas of human behaviour, isn’t about right and wrong.

5 Ways To Beat Writer’s Block

Aside from grand dreams of writing a bestselling novel, my only real plan as I went through school and university was to avoid ending up being a teacher and to somehow make a living writing. I’ve been fortunate enough that apart from a brief spell as a bad telemarketer and a decidedly unmysterious mystery shopper, writing has been how I’ve made money to live. There’s a lot to recommend writing as a career, but it does mean that you sign up to be stalked – and eventually caught – by writer’s block.

I think it probably hits everyone differently; for me, it’s less the traditional big, black depressive weight and more a feeling of flimsiness and incredible lightness: when I’ve got it, I can’t focus or hold on to any thought and I’m incredibly easily distracted. But deadlines being what they are – albeit slightly less lethal than the Civil War originals – there are times when  you just need to get on with it. So here are the methods I use when I need to crank out some words:

The first one to try is to start at a different point. One of the main disadvantages of how most people write now – using a word processor – is that it presents an unwritten piece of writing as a series of sequential blank lines that should be filled. It’s just not as easy to skip around in a Word doc as it is on a piece of paper, and I think this has contributed to people losing sight of the fact that only when a piece of writing is finished is it even remotely linear (and even then, if you’re B.S. Johnson, writer of the ‘book-in-the-box‘ that’s not true). So until you’re done, you can, as a writer go anywhere, and you should. If you can’t think of a good intro, but know what you want to say about a certain point, go there. Start where you’re most enthusiastic. You may even find that where you want to start should actually be the start, and that your fixed, linear plan – the one that made no sense to your writing brain, and gummed it up in the first place – needed fixing all along.

Secondly, if you’re convinced what your writing is just minging – that somehow, your prose is just having an ugly day – try doing the spade work instead. If you have any hand-written notes from the planing stage, or quotes you’ve underlined in books that you want
to use, when you’ve got writer’s block, it’s a good time to type them
into the word processor – it’s simple, useful work, and often, as you simply get into the typing, that your own writing will want to get going, too.

Because I like to believe the act of writing is more dramatic than it looks, this third technique  sounds like a move from Streetfighter 2:  unleash super stream fury. Written English is full of rules: spelling, grammar, good manners (such as not beginning a sentence with the word ‘ because’). If your inspiration is fragile, if you’re chasing a delicate meaning then these structures can easily halt your progress. So sometimes you need to just type. Don’t go near the comma or full stop buttons, don’t use the enter button, don’t think about tense or grammar: JUST TYPE. Don’t even look at the screen. Don’t be afraid to leave sentences hanging, or to repeat something in slightly different form. Just go for it, and fix it when you come back on the 2nd draft.

My fourth tip is similar to the first point: if you can’t write something, try inverting it. So if you’re writing a part of the piece that takes an overview of the situation, go for a closer look instead. Switch from the globe to the microscope, or vice versa. Although it’s a radical change, as it’s related to what you’re trying to write (i.e., it is its opposite), it will often work, and even if it doesn’t, it may help you figure out what it is you’re trying to say.

And finally, get out more. It doesn’t matter if you spend five, six, seven hours at the computer trying to write something and yet all you’ve managed to turn out is a few muddled lines. Quality, not quantity. A walk is a great way to clear the head, plus, if you’ve been huddled over a glowing screen for the last few hours, the flood of new images, sounds and smells from the outside world should act like a nitro boost to your cortex. It’s also a good opportunity to buy some milk/the paper/food for dinner, so even if you don’t get any ideas for writing, you can still tick a few errands off the list 🙂

links for 2007-06-26